Every desk wants a proven track record. There is nowhere to build one.
Foretec runs live competitions on real European electricity market data. Participants forecast, bid across day-ahead and intraday, and carry the imbalance. Every entry is scored on the money it would actually have made.
96 settlement periods · one day of imbalance prices in DK1
You have a 100 MW wind farm in DK1. How much do you sell day-ahead?
where you end up, day-ahead only where you could end up if you also trade intraday
How this is scored
Sell more than you generate and you buy the shortfall back at the imbalance price; sell less and the surplus settles cheap. The optimal commitment therefore sits below your median forecast. The shaded area is what a second trade in intraday could still recover once the forecast has sharpened. It widens as your day-ahead commitment gets worse, because there is more error left to correct.
100% = selling actual generation at the day-ahead price. Day-ahead €80/MWh, intraday €72 sell / €90 buy, imbalance €108 short / €58 long with occasional spikes. Forecast median 55.5 MW on 100 MW of capacity. Illustrative DK1 conditions, not a specific trading day.
The demo assumes a well-calibrated forecast and a known price asymmetry, so it isolates the commitment decision from the forecasting problem. A real edition is harder: participants supply the distribution as well as the position, and nobody knows in advance which way the system will be short.
The same shortlist circulates, and the evidence arrives after the hire.
Typical agency fee for one quantitative hire in European power trading, at 15–25 % of first-year salary, for a candidate whose models nobody has measured.
What a European transmission system operator already pays forecasters, per market, ranked on accuracy alone. Crowdsourced forecasting is operational, not hypothetical.
Neutral, recurring, multi-sponsor competitions for energy trading talent in Europe. Firms run their own, occasionally, behind closed doors.
Every job advert in this market asks for a proven track record, and there is no venue in which anyone can build one. Foretec is that venue: neutral, recurring, and open to the whole market rather than to one employer.
How an edition works
-
01
Qualify
Participants bring their own data. The platform publishes the settled series every score is computed from, a baseline model and tutorials for the free sources. A qualifying round on historical periods filters the field and opens the leaderboard.
-
02
Commit, daily
Before each gate closure, every participant submits a probabilistic forecast and a position, then adjusts it in intraday as the forecast sharpens. Submissions are timestamped server-side and locked. Nobody sees the outcome before committing.
-
03
Settle on realised prices
Positions settle against published day-ahead, intraday and imbalance prices. The score is the share of perfect-foresight revenue captured, which is the benchmark a battery desk already uses internally.
-
04
Meet the top of the board
Sponsors receive the ranked pool with full performance histories and speak to whoever they want. Participants compete under a pseudonym and choose when to reveal themselves.
What a submission looks like
96 periods, one row each. A single column of positions is a valid entry; the optional columns are where the edition is won.
Read the full mechanics: gates, settlement formulas, the price-impact model, what the platform publishes and the edition calendar.
The aggregate
The crowd competes too
Every submission is aggregated into a single meta-forecast that enters the leaderboard under its own name, scored on both tracks like any other participant.
A standing benchmark on your market, and the people who top it.
You choose the problem: the bidding zone, the asset mix, the products. Several hundred modellers work on it for three months, in public, scored on realised money. You keep the aggregate, the leaderboard, and first access to whoever is at the top of it.
Anchor partner · one per edition
Set the problem
- Choose the target market: bidding zone, asset mix and which products are traded
- Seat on the edition’s advisory board, chairing the rules and scoring decisions
- Platform access to the individual and collaborative input of the top ten, period by period
- Exclusive first window on the ranked pool, ahead of every other sponsor
- Title branding on the edition
Recruiting partner
Meet the board
- Seat on the edition’s advisory board
- Platform access to the individual and collaborative input of every participant above baseline
- Full leaderboard access once the anchor window closes
- Opt-in profiles and introductions
- Presence on the leaderboard and in participant mailings
Ecosystem partner
Reach the field
- Opt-in profile pool excluding the finalists
- Visibility with several hundred quantitative modellers
- Distribute API credits, data trials or tooling to participants
What sponsors see, and what they don't
Participants keep their code. Sponsors work with what is submitted to the platform: individual input, participant by participant, and the collaborative input aggregated from it. Never the models behind either. That is what makes strong people willing to enter, and it is the more useful material anyway.
The advisory board runs for one edition. Anchor and recruiting partners each hold a seat; the anchor partner chairs it. It meets before the qualifying round and at each scoring milestone, and it decides rules, gates and scoring for that edition only. It sees nothing the tier does not already grant, and never the identity of a participant who has not revealed themselves.
Packages are priced per edition against what a single unverified hire costs today. Ask and we will send the numbers.
Find out when the first edition opens.
Occasional updates on dates, the edition spec, sponsorship and results. No more than one email a month, and nothing else ever.
Opens a pre-filled message in your mail client. Nothing is stored on this page.
Thank you. Send the message your mail client just opened and you are on the list.